Abstract
Viscoelastic properties of striated muscle are often measured using length perturbation analysis and quantified as a complex modulus, whose elastic and viscous components reflect the energy-storage and energy-absorbing properties of the tissue, respectively. The energy stored as inertia is commonly ignored due to the small size of samples examined, typically <1 mm. Considering recent advances in tissue engineering to generate muscle tissues of larger sizes, we questioned whether ignoring the inertial artifact was still reasonable in these samples. To answer this question, we derived and solved the one-dimensional wave equation that describes the propagation of strain along the length of a sample. The inertial artifact was predicted to contaminate the elastic modulus with (2πf)(2)L(0)(2)ρ/6, where f is perturbation frequency, L(0) is muscle length, and ρ is muscle density. We then measured viscoelastic properties up to 500 Hz in mouse skeletal muscle fibers at long (4.8 mm) and short (<1 mm) lengths and up to 100 Hz in rat cardiac slices at long (10-12 mm) and short (<2 mm) lengths. We found the elastic modulus of long preparations was elevated as frequency increased and was about half the magnitude of that predicted by the model. While the prediction tended to overestimate the measured inertial artifact, these results provided some validity to the model. We used the predicted artifact as an overly conservative estimate of error that might arise in a mechanics assay of mammalian striated muscle, whose nominal resting stiffness is on the order 100 kN m(-2). We found that muscle lengths of <1 mm resulted in negligible inertial artifact (<0.5% error) for perturbation frequencies under 250 Hz. Muscle samples longer than 5 mm, on the other hand, would result in >5% error at frequencies of 200 Hz and higher.