Comparative effectiveness of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a systematic review of observational studies

头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染性心内膜炎的疗效比较:一项观察性研究的系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is a leading cause of infective endocarditis (IE), associated with high morbidity and mortality. While antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) are considered the standard treatment, cefazolin has emerged as a potential alternative due to its pharmacokinetic advantages and lower toxicity profile. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of cefazolin compared with ASPs in adult patients with MSSA infective endocarditis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science up to 2024. We included cohort studies and non-randomized trials comparing cefazolin and ASPs in adult patients with MSSA IE. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Seven cohort studies involving 1685 patients (305 cefazolin; 1380 ASPs) were included. Thirty-day mortality, reported in two studies (n = 1083), was lower with cefazolin (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.83; I² = 0%). Ninety-day mortality (three studies, n = 475) showed no significant difference (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.57; I² = 0%). No significant differences were observed in relapse rates (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.34-3.02; I² = 12.5%), hospital stay duration (SMD -0.06; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.14), or bacteremia duration (SMD -0.96; 95% CI -1.93 to 0.01). Safety data suggested a lower incidence of adverse events with cefazolin, although definitions varied across studies. Risk of bias was moderate in most studies. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin demonstrated comparable efficacy to ASPs for the treatment of MSSA IE, with a potential reduction in short-term mortality and a favorable safety profile. These findings support cefazolin as a viable therapeutic alternative, but randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024593515.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。