Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although it is apparently simpler to perform unstented tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair for distal hypospadias repair, consensus on feasibility of the use of unstented repair is still a matter of debate. Evidence reporting that unstented repair outcome is comparable to stented repair, especially in the long-term, is still weak due to reporting outcome inconsistencies, different study designs, inclusion of more than one technique, and inherent variability in meatal locations. Thus, we need a continuous and evolving assessment of the outcome of unstented repair to compile adequate evidence on the advantage of unstented TIP repair in distal hypospadias entity. The aim of this article was to review our long-term results with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias repair without a postoperative stent to determine its outcome which might justify its use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a review of 154 patients with distal penile hypospadias, who underwent repair in Minia Urology & Nephrology University Hospital in the period between June 2015 and February 2018, we excluded cases who underwent MAGPI repair, redo cases and patients who failed to complete follow-up. We chose 72 patients who had only 1(st) time TIP repair and whom we could contact. A total of 44 out of 72 cases with stented repair were assigned to Group A, while 28 cases with unstented repair were assigned to Group B. Success was assessed based on Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) score by three separate senior pediatric urology consultants, independent of the surgeon and in the absence of high post-void residual urine (PVR). Average rate was calculated to be compared between both study groups. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference regarding preoperative meatal location and age at repair and short-term complications. In the long-term; there was no statistically significant difference between the occurrence of urethrocutanous fistula (UCF, 4 vs 2 cases in Group A & B, respectively) and complete disruption (2 cases in each group) with need for redo repair. Results of total mean of HOPE score calculated showed no statistically significant differences between study groups and also failed to showed statistical significance on individual domains of HOPE score. CONCLUSIONS: Unstented TIP repair showed a similar outcome to stented TIP repair of distal hypospadias especially in the long-term despite a more troublesome early postoperative period.