Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differentiating between papilledema and pseudopapilledema in children presenting with mild-to-moderate optic nerve head elevation is challenging. This study sought to determine which B-scan ultrasonography (BSUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features, individually or in combination, are best able to differentiate between papilledema and pseudopapilledema in children. METHODS: Children presenting with optic nerve head elevation of unknown etiology were eligible if they underwent BSUS and OCT performed by the same investigator. The absolute optic nerve sheath diameter (in millimeter) along with the presence/absence of a hyperreflective nodule(s) at the optic nerve head (indicative of druse) from BSUS was determined. The average circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL), diameter of Bruch membrane opening, maximum papillary height, and the presence/absence of hyper-/hyporeflective lesions at the optic nerve head were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate which BSUS and OCT imaging features, individually and in combination, accurately classified children as having papilledema vs pseudopapilledema. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one eyes from 94 children (mean age, 11.0 years; range, 3.2-17.9) were included; 36 eyes with papilledema and 145 eyes with pseudopapilledema. Among BSUS features, optic nerve sheath widening (>4.5 mm) demonstrated the best sensitivity (86%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64%-96%) and specificity (88%; 95% CI, 79%-94%) for papilledema. Among OCT measures, cpRNFL thickness of ≥140 µm demonstrated the best sensitivity (83%; 95% CI, 66%-93%) and specificity (76%; 95% CI, 66%-84%) to identify papilledema. The presence of both optic nerve sheath widening (>4.5 mm) and cpRNFL thickness of ≥140 µm reduced the sensitivity (72%; 95% CI, 52%-86%) but increased specificity (95%; 95% CI, 88%-98%). CONCLUSION: BSUS (optic nerve sheath widening [>4.5 mm]) and OCT (cpRNFL thickness ≥140 µm), individually and collectively, have good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between papilledema and pseudopapilledema. The presence of druse does not exclude the diagnosis of papilledema.