Summary of Data from the Sixth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop: Case 1 Code Verification

第六届AIAA CFD阻力预测研讨会数据总结:案例1代码验证

阅读:1

Abstract

Results from the Sixth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-VI), Case 1 Code Verification are presented. This test case is for the turbulent flow over a 2D NACA 0012 airfoil using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. A numerical benchmark solution is available for the standard Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model that can be used for code verification purposes, i.e., to verify that the numerical algorithms employed are consistent and that there are no programming mistakes in the software. For the Case 1 code verification study, there were 31 data submissions from 16 teams: 23 with the SA model (using various versions), 4 with the k-omega SST model (two variants), and one each with k-kl, k-epsilon, an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model, and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) with very large eddy simulation (VLES). Various grid types were employed including structured, unstructured, Cartesian, and adapted grids. The benchmark numerical solution was deemed to be the correct solution for the 21 submissions with the standard SA model, the SA-noft2 variant (without the f (t2) term), and the SA-neg variant (designed to avoid nonphysical transient states in discrete settings). While many of these 21 submissions did demonstrate first-order convergence on the finer meshes, others showed either nonconvergent solutions in terms of the aerodynamic forces and moments or converged to the wrong answer. Results for this case highlight the continuing need for rigorous code verification to be conducted as a prerequisite for design, model validation, and analysis studies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。