Abstract
Modifying the salt form of active pharmaceutical ingredients is a common method to enhance their physicochemical and biological properties, whilst improving their ability to be formulated into medicines that can be effectively delivered to patients. Salts and counterions are especially relevant to peptide therapies, given that the majority of low molecular weight peptides synthesised by solid-phase protocols form a trifluoroacetate (TFA) salt due to the use of trifluoroacetic acid in resin cleaving and follow-on purification methods. TFA salts are not viewed as favourably by medicine regulators and can be defined as a new chemical entity entirely due to their different biological and physicochemical properties. Despite some exceptions, the vast majority of therapeutic peptides are marketed as hydrochloride (HCl) or acetate salts, even though most early research and development is centred on TFA salts. The aim of the study was to compare the impact of salt form (TFA vs. HCl) on the biostability, cell cytotoxicity, drug release and rheological properties of a Napffky(p)G-OH peptide hydrogel platform that demonstrates promise as a long-acting drug delivery system. This study demonstrated no significant difference between the salt forms for properties important to its intended use. This paper also raises important points for discussion relating to the environmental and regulatory status of peptide salts and their use as pharmaceuticals.