Abstract
It is uncertain whether prior Kasai procedures negatively impact the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). The prior meta-analysis did not distinguish between Kasai early failure (K-EF) and late failure (K-LF). Numerous studies have been recently published; therefore, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies comparing the outcomes of biliary atresia (BA) patients undergoing primary LT versus patients with prior Kasai procedures. Subgroup analysis was done at the time of Kasai failure (early vs. late). Twenty-five studies comprising 6,408 patients receiving LT were included in the analysis. We found a statistically significant increase in one-year graft survival in K-LF versus primary liver transplant (pLT) (P = 0.0003). One-year patient survival was also increased in K-LF, although not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No difference in the one- and five-year graft and patient survival, reoperation rate, infection, and biliary complication was seen in pLT vs overall prior Kasai (K-EF and K-LF). These results suggest that prior kasai procedure does not negatively impact the outcome of LT. In addition, BA patients with prior Kasai undergoing LT later in life tend to perform better than primary liver transplants.