Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is a method for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with satisfactory outcomes. One of the novel methods for predicting LT outcomes is the Metroticket 2.0 model. The disease in patients initially within the Milan criteria (MC) may progress while on a transplantation waitlist; thus, various transplantation bridging therapy (BT) methods are proposed for patients to stay within the MC and optimize the LT outcome. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LT for HCC at an oncological and transplantation center in northern Poland. Patients who underwent (n = 10) or did not undergo (n = 11) BT were included. The primary endpoints of the study were mortality among the patients, HCC recurrence, and Metroticket 2.0 scores based on LT qualification results and explant pathology outcomes. The median follow-up length was 44.03 months. Results: Patients who underwent BT had significantly lower Metroticket 2.0 scores and greater AFP concentrations at baseline. At LT, there was no significant difference in Metroticket 2.0 scores or AFP concentrations between the groups. Explant Metroticket 2.0 scores were significantly lower in patients who received BT. A complete pathologic response was achieved in 30.0% of patients who underwent BT. The recurrence-free survival rates were 100% and 90.91% in patients who underwent and did not undergo BT, respectively. Overall survival was 80.0% and 81.81% in patients who underwent and did not undergo BT, respectively. Conclusions: BT should be considered only as a means of remaining within the LT criteria. Routine BT does not appear to be justified for LT patients.