Fate of urea-(15)N as influenced by different irrigation modes

不同灌溉方式对尿素-(15)N去向的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

Fertilizer nitrogen (N) is a main pollutant in the agricultural ecosystem, while the fate of fertilizer N influenced by different irrigation modes is not well comparatively investigated. In this study, the distribution of fertilizer N in soil layers and tomato organs as well as its loss under drip, spray and flood irrigation with different quotas of 140, 180 and 220 m(3) ha(-1) were evaluated quantitatively by using nitrogen-15 ((15)N) labeled urea (abundance of 19.6%) as fertilizer source. The results showed that the plant (15)N, soil (15)N and (15)N loss accounted for 27.9-47.8%, 38.8-54.0% and 10.3-21.9% of the total applied (15)N, respectively. The amount of (15)N absorbed by plants was significantly (p < 0.05) higher under drip and spray irrigation in comparison to flood irrigation with the same irrigation quota. The maximum (15)N use efficiency and the minimum (15)N residual were detected under drip irrigation with quota of 180 m(3) ha(-1), indicating that the supply and demand of urea-(15)N was more synchronized under such an irrigation mode. The (15)N loss increased obviously as irrigation quota increased. Moreover, the correlation analysis between (15)N loss and the possible impact factors indicated that the soil mineral (15)N content after irrigation was one important factor influencing the (15)N loss. Among the three irrigation modes, spray irrigation caused the lowest (15)N loss of 10.3-13.1% when using the same irrigation quota. It was concluded that the irrigation modes have profound impacts on the fate of urea-(15)N. Irrigation could be used as a regulation pathway of plant N absorption and agricultural N output.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。