Abstract
Introduction As the US population continues to age, there is a critical need for geriatricians to be trained and engaged in research to inform high-quality care for older adults. Our objective was to understand the extent, type, barriers, and facilitators of research training and the attitudes toward research training and scholarly activity among Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited US geriatric fellowship programs. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of geriatric fellowship program directors from September to November 2022. Surveys assessing program characteristics, requirements for scholarly activity, director demographics, and director attitudes toward scholarly activity were distributed via email. We used descriptive statistics to assess fellowship scholarly activity requirements, facilitators, and perceived barriers. Results The survey response rate was 35.3% (41/116 programs). Most programs (82.9%) required participation in scholarly activity and provided protected time (73.2%). Definitions of scholarly activities greatly differed among programs. The most common scholarly activity requirements included participation in a scholarly project (70.7%) or local presentation (46.3%). The short duration of fellowship was the most common major barrier, reported by 70.7% of directors. Lastly, 34.1% of directors indicated satisfaction with the quality of research training provided, while 65.9% of directors reported satisfaction with the opportunities provided to participate in scholarly activities. Conclusions Overall, program requirements, facilitators, and perceived barriers to scholarly activity were heterogeneous among US geriatric program directors. Additionally, only about one-third of directors were satisfied with the research training provided. Our future work will compare the attitudes and reported barriers/facilitators of program director and fellow participants toward participation in scholarly activity.