Relationships between Plasma Pyrophosphate, Vascular Calcification and Clinical Severity in Patients Affected by Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum

弹性纤维假黄瘤患者血浆焦磷酸盐和血管钙化与临床严重程度的关系

阅读:6
作者:Georges Leftheriotis, Nastassia Navasiolava, Laetitia Clotaire, Christophe Duranton, Olivier Le Saux, Saïd Bendahhou, Audrey Laurain, Isabelle Rubera, Ludovic Martin

Abstract

Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE; OMIM 264800) is an autosomal recessive metabolic disorder characterized by progressive calcification in the skin, the Bruch’s membrane, and the vasculature. Calcification in PXE results from a low level of circulating pyrophosphate (PPi) caused by ABCC6 deficiency. In this study, we used a cohort of 107 PXE patients to determine the pathophysiological relationship between plasma PPi, coronary calcification (CAC), lower limbs arterial calcification (LLAC), and disease severity. Overall, our data showed a deficit in plasma PPi in PXE patients compared to controls. Remarkably, affected females showed higher PPi levels than males, but a lower LLAC. There was a strong correlation between age and PPi in PXE patients (r = 0.423, p < 0.0001) but not in controls (r = 0.059, p = 0.828). A weak correlation was found between PPi and CAC (r = 0.266, p < 0.02); however, there was no statistically significant connection with LLAC (r = 0.068, p = 0.518) or a severity score (r = 0.077, p = 0.429). Surprisingly, we found no significant correlation between plasma alkaline phosphatase activity and PPi (r = 0.113, p = 0.252) or between a 10-year cardiovascular risk score and all other variables. Multivariate analysis confirmed that LLAC and CAC were strongly dependent on age, but not on PPi. Our data showed that arterial calcification is only weakly linked to circulating PPi levels and that time (i.e., age) appears to be the major determinant of disease severity and calcification in PXE. These data are important to better understand the natural history of this disease but also for the follow-up and management of patients, and the design of future clinical trials. Our results also show that PPi is not a good biomarker for the evaluation of disease severity and progression.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。