Abstract
Modern automated laboratory haematology analysers use various methods to measure different haematological parameters. These parameters are useful in the diagnostic and clinical interpretation of patient symptoms. So, it is very important to compare the performance of different analysers measuring the same parameter. Hence, a comparison of complete blood counts analysed by Sysmex XN 3000 and Horiba Yumizen H2500 was performed. Total 296 EDTA anti-coagulated blood samples were processed in both the analysers in duplicate within 4 h of collection. The white blood cell count, red blood cell count, erythrocyte indices, differential leukocyte count, platelet count and platelet indices and reticulocyte count were compared. A good level of correlation and agreement between different parameters were obtained. A strong correlation was observed (r > 0.9) between Sysmex XN 3000 and Yumizen H2500 for WBC (0.997), RBC (0.997), Haemoglobin (0.999), haematocrit (0.974), MCV (0.902), MCH (0.99),, platelet count by impedance (0.989), mean platelet volume (0.954), plateletcrit (0.971), platelet distribution width (PDW) (0.916), neutrophils (0.997), lymphocytes (0.989), monocytes (0.943), and eosinophils (0.991) counts. A moderate correlation was observed for RDW-CV (0.75). The basophils count showed poor correlation (r < 0.5) possibly because of sample selection with mostly low basophils count. An acceptable bias was observed for most of the parameters like WBC, RBC, Haemoglobin, Haematocrit, platelet counts, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils and monocytes. The studied instruments ensured satisfactory interchangeability except for few parameters, thus facilitate substitution of one analyser by another without affecting the clinical decision making.