A Model-Based (13)C-Sucrose Breath Test Diagnostic for Gut Function Disorders Characterized by a Loss of Sucrase-Isomaltase Enzymatic Activity

一种基于模型的 (13)C-蔗糖呼气试验,用于诊断以蔗糖酶-异麦芽糖酶活性丧失为特征的肠道功能障碍。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) causes malnutrition in children in low-resource settings. Stable-isotope breath tests have been proposed as noninvasive tests of altered nutrient metabolism and absorption in EED, but uncertainty over interpreting the breath curves has limited their use. The activity of sucrose-isomaltase, the glucosidase enzyme responsible for sucrose hydrolysis, may be reduced in EED. We previously developed a mechanistic model describing the dynamics of the (13)C-sucrose breath test ((13)C-SBT) as a function of underlying metabolic processes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine which breath test curve dynamics are associated with sucrose hydrolysis and with the transport and metabolism of the fructose and glucose moieties and to propose and evaluate a model-based diagnostic for the loss of activity of sucrase-isomaltase. METHODS: We applied the mechanistic model to 2 sets of exploratory (13)C-SBT experiments in healthy adult participants. First, 19 participants received differently labeled sucrose tracers (U-(13)C fructose, U-(13)C glucose, and U-(13)C sucrose) in a crossover study. Second, 16 participants received a sucrose tracer accompanied by 0, 100, and 750 mg of Reducose, a sucrase-isomaltase inhibitor. We evaluated a model-based diagnostic distinguishing between inhibitor concentrations using receiver operator curves, comparing with conventional statistics. RESULTS: Sucrose hydrolysis and the transport and metabolism of the fructose and glucose moieties were reflected in the same mechanistic process. The model distinguishes these processes from the fraction of tracer exhaled and an exponential metabolic process. The model-based diagnostic performed as well as the conventional summary statistics in distinguishing between no and low inhibition [area under the curve (AUC): 0.77 vs. 0.66-0.79] and for low vs. high inhibition (AUC 0.92 vs. 0.91-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Current summary approaches to interpreting (13)C breath test curves may be limited to identifying only gross gut dysfunction. A mechanistic model-based approach improved interpretation of breath test curves characterizing sucrose metabolism.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。