Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel endoscopic purse-string suture auxiliary instrument compared with traditional methods for closure of a full-thickness defect of the stomach in an ex vivo model. METHODS: Twelve perforation sites (10-20 mm in diameter) were created in the ex vivo porcine stomach models. Two physicians (A and B had performed endoscopic surgery for 6 and 3 years) performed suturing using both the experimental and traditional (control) instruments. Operation time, success rate, and number of attempts for successful suture required were recorded. RESULTS: For physician A, the median suturing time was 56.50 s (interquartile range [IQR] 40.50 s, 134.50 s) and 215.50 s (IQR 63.75 s, 254.75 s) in the experimental and control groups. For physician B, they were 53.00 s (IQR 38.50 s, 87.75 s) and 174.00 s (IQR 104.50 s, 279.25 s), respectively. The differences between experimental and control groups were statistically significant for both physicians A (p = 0.010) and B (p = 0.004). The median number of attempts required for successful suturing in the experimental and control groups was 1 (IQR 1, 2) and 2 (IQR 1, 3) for physician A, and 1 (IQR 1, 1) and 3 (IQR 2, 3) for physician B, which were statistically significant for both physicians (p = 0.026 and 0.006). The overall success rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (100% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: This novel purse-string suture auxiliary instrument may assist in single-channel endoscopic suturing operations, improve the suture success rate, reduce the number of operations required, and shorten the operation time.