Abstract
Conventional health risk assessments do not adequately reflect short-term exposure characteristics following chemical accidents. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of existing assessment methods and propose a more suitable risk assessment approach for short-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. We analyzed foundational studies used to derive reference concentration (RfC), reference dose (RfD), and minimal risk level (MRL) values and applied these health guidance values (HGVs) to a hypothetical chemical accident scenario. An analysis of the studies underlying each HGV revealed that, except for the RfC for formaldehyde and the RfD for toluene, all values were derived under research conditions comparable to their respective exposure durations. Given the differing toxicity mechanisms between acute and chronic exposures, MRLs that were aligned with the corresponding exposure durations supported more appropriate risk management decisions. The health risk assessment results showed that RfC/RfD-based hazard quotients (HQs) were consistently higher than MRL-based HQs across all age groups and both substances, indicating that RfC/RfD values tend to yield more conservative risk estimates. For formaldehyde, the use of RfC instead of MRL resulted in an additional 208 tiles (2.08 km(2)) being classified as areas of potential concern (HQ > 1) relative to the MRL-based evaluation. These findings highlighted that the selection of HGVs can significantly influence the spatial extent of areas of potential concern, potentially altering health risk determinations for large population groups. This study provides a scientific basis for improving exposure and risk assessment frameworks under short-term exposure conditions. It also serves as valuable foundational data for developing effective and rational risk management strategies during actual chemical accidents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply MRLs to a short-term chemical accident scenario and directly compare them with traditional reference values.