Self-report depression screening measures for older Hispanic/Latin American adults: A PRISMA systematic review

针对老年西班牙裔/拉丁美洲成年人的自评抑郁症筛查量表:PRISMA系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing depression symptoms in Hispanic/Latin American (H/Ls) older adults, a group at high risk for depression, is nuanced due to the influence of cultural characteristics in symptom expression and manifestation. Little is known about the psychometric properties of available measures when used with this population. METHODS: We conducted a two-stage systematic review of available depression assessment tools. We first identified self-report measures designed for use with adults. We then identified studies where at least one of such measures was used with older H/Ls that reported psychometric properties for the measure(s) used. RESULTS: Only 3 measures were identified for use with older H/Ls: the BDI, GDS, and CES-D. However, few data were found to support the validity of the BDI, and the CES-D was not consistently valid across cultural groups. The GDS was found appropriate, though its performance varied based on race/ethnicity, nationality, and cutoff scores. The CES-D and GDS also demonstrated varying psychometric properties based on study setting (research versus clinical) and target population (inpatient psychiatric patients versus community-dwelling individuals). LIMITATIONS: The number of articles that met criteria for inclusion in our review was small, and there was variation among samples of the few studies included. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available self-report depression screening measures have acceptable applicability among older H/Ls, but their utility may vary based on their intended use. Modified cutoff scores may be beneficial in maximizing the utility of these measures when given to diverse older adults.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。