Discussion
Our study in IRBD shows that (1) RT-QuIC detects AS in the skin and CSF with similar high sensitivity, specificity, and agreement, (2) AS RT-QuIC positivity is associated with supportive features and biomarkers of synucleinopathy, and (3) skin punch biopsy and lumbar puncture have comparable mild adverse effects, tolerance, and acceptance. RT-QuIC in the skin or CSF might represent a patient selection strategy for future neuroprotective trials targeting AS in IRBD. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that RT-QuIC-detected AS in the skin and CSF distinguishes patients with IRBD from controls.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study where consecutive patients with polysomnographic-confirmed IRBD and age-matched controls without RBD underwent skin biopsy and lumbar puncture the same day. Three-millimeter skin punch biopsies were obtained bilaterally in the cervical region from dorsal C7 and C8 dermatomes and in distal legs. RT-QuIC assessed AS in these 6 skin sites and the CSF.
Results
We recruited 91 patients with IRBD and 41 controls. In the skin, sensitivity to detect AS was 76.9% (95% CI 66.9-85.1), specificity 97.6% (95% CI 87.1-99.9) positive predictive value 98.6% (95% CI 91.0-99.8), negative predictive value 65.6% (95% CI 56.6-73.6), and accuracy 83.3% (95% CI 75.9-89.3). In the CSF, the sensitivity was 75.0% (95% CI 64.6-83.6), the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI 86.8-99.9), the positive predictive value was 98.5% (95% CI 90.5-99.8), the negative predictive value was 63.9% (95% CI 55.2-71.9), and the accuracy was 82.0% (95% CI 74.3-88.3). Results in the skin and CSF samples showed 99.2% agreement. Compared with negative patients, RT-QuIC AS-positive patients had a higher likelihood ratio of prodromal Parkinson disease (p < 0.001) and showed more frequently hyposmia (p < 0.001), dopamine transporter imaging single-photon emission CT deficit (p = 0.002), and orthostatic hypotension (p = 0.014). No severe or moderate adverse effects were reported. There was no difference between the percentage of participants reporting mild adverse events secondary to skin biopsy or lumbar puncture (9.1% vs 17.2%; p = 0.053). One hundred and ten (83%) and 104 (80%) participants, respectively, stated they would accept to undergo skin biopsy and lumbar puncture again for research purposes.