Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether quantitative OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters can be used to distinguish among eyes at various stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in an urban safety-net hospital population. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty-nine eyes from 329 patients were included in this study: 90 nondiabetic patients, 170 diabetic patients without DR, 57 diabetic patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 12 diabetic patients with severe NPDR to proliferative DR. METHODS: Patients underwent OCTA imaging and ultra-widefield fundus photography at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center between April and October 2018. For participants with diabetes, imaging was classified according to DR severity by a telemedicine reading center. Eight OCTA parameters were analyzed. Perfusion density and vessel length density (VD) were examined from both the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus. The other 4 parameters were examined only from the SCP. Total extrafoveal avascular area (tEAA) was based on the area of absent capillary vessels. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ)-related metrics consisted of FAZ area, FAZ circularity index, and FAZ acircularity index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for OCTA parameters to distinguish among groups according to DR severity. RESULTS: All OCTA parameters demonstrated a significant relationship with DR severity (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found when comparing nondiabetic participants versus diabetic participants without retinopathy. The FAZ area was the only metric that demonstrated a significant difference between genders: mean of 0.29±0.12 mm(2) in men and 0.34±0.13 mm(2) in women (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that tEAA had the highest AUC when comparing various stages of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this urban, public hospital population, quantification of retinal vascular findings with OCTA imaging was a useful means of distinguishing patients according to DR severity. Because these results were similar to those of other tertiary referral centers, it would be reasonable to perform further DR-related OCTA studies in this population and expect generalizable results.