Comparison of acute thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption in three different durable polymer coronary drug-eluting stents

三种不同耐久性聚合物冠状动脉药物洗脱支架的急性血栓形成及白蛋白吸附比较

阅读:11
作者:Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Matthew Kutyna, Sho Torii, Qi Cheng, Atsushi Sakamoto, Liang Guo, Anne Cornelissen, Laura E L Perkins, Syed F Hossainy, Stephen D Pacetti, Frank D Kolodgie, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn

Aims

This study sought to compare the thromboresistance and albumin binding capacity of different durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) using dedicated preclinical and in vitro models.

Background

The relative thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption and retention of different durable polymers used in coronary stents has not been tested. Aims: This study sought to compare the thromboresistance and albumin binding capacity of different durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) using dedicated preclinical and in vitro models.

Conclusions

These results suggest that thromboresistance and albumin retention vary by polymer type and that these differences might result in different suitability for short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

Methods

In an ex vivo swine arteriovenous shunt model, a fluoropolymer everolimus-eluting stent (FP-EES) (n=14) was compared with two durable polymer DES, the BioLinx polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (BL-ZES) (n=9) and a CarboSil elastomer polymer-coated ridaforolimus-eluting stent (EP-RES) (n=6), and bare metal stents (BMS) (n=10). Stents underwent immunostaining using a cocktail of antiplatelet antibodies and a marker for inflammation and were then evaluated by confocal microscopy (CM). Albumin retention was assessed using a flow loop model with labelled human serum albumin (FP-EES [n=8], BL-ZES [n=4], EP-RES [n=4], and BMS [n=7]), and scanned by CM.

Results

The area of platelet adherence (normalised to total stent surface area) was lower in the order FP-EES (9.8%), BL-ZES (32.7%), EP-RES (87.6%) and BMS (202.0%), and inflammatory cell density was least for FP-EES <BL-ZES <EP-RES <BMS. Although nearly full coverage by albumin binding was shown for all durable polymer DES, FP-EES showed significantly greater intensity of albumin as compared to BL-ZES, EP-RES and BMS (FP-EES 79.0%; BL-ZES 13.2%; EP-RES 6.1%; BMS 1.5%). Conclusions: These results suggest that thromboresistance and albumin retention vary by polymer type and that these differences might result in different suitability for short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。