Discussion
Our proposed workflow is a convenient and effective method for strain typing of M. ovipneumoniae and can be applied to other bacterial MLST schemes. The workflow is suitable for diagnostic settings, where reduced hands-on time, cost, and multiplexing capabilities are important.
Methods
Our study aimed to develop and validate an MLST workflow for typing of M. ovipneumoniae using Nanopore Rapid Barcoding sequencing and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We compare the workflow with Nanopore Native Barcoding library preparation and Illumina MiSeq amplicon protocols to determine the most accurate and cost-effective method for sequencing multiplex amplicons. A multiplex PCR was optimized for four housekeeping genes of M. ovipneumoniae using archived DNA samples (N = 68) from nasal swabs.
Results
Sequences recovered from Nanopore Rapid Barcoding correctly identified all MLST types with the shortest total workflow time and lowest cost per sample when compared with Nanopore Native Barcoding and Illumina MiSeq methods.