Comparison of Simple Drainage Versus Drainage With Tract Destruction in the Management of Pilonidal Abscess

单纯引流与引流破坏术治疗藏毛窦脓肿的比较

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pilonidal disease is an acquired condition primarily affecting the gluteal cleft and sacrococcygeal area, often complicated by the formation of sinuses and abscesses. Despite multiple surgical options, there is no universally accepted standard treatment. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of simple drainage alone versus drainage combined with sinus destruction using the same incision technique. METHODS: Between February 2019 and March 2024, a total of 480 patients with acute pilonidal abscesses received treatment. Of these, 235 underwent simple drainage (Group A), while 245 had drainage with sinus damage (Group B). All participants were followed for at least nine months, with recurrence rates recorded throughout. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: In Group A, 131 patients (55.7%) experienced a recurrence, compared to only 29 patients (11.8%) in Group B. This difference is statistically significant (p < 0.001). The majority of recurrences occurred in younger, male, and overweight individuals. CONCLUSION: Removing the sinus tract during the same procedure as abscess drainage greatly lowers the chance of the abscess recurring, compared to drainage alone. Incorporating sinus destruction into the initial surgery might eliminate the need for subsequent operations for people with pilonidal abscesses.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。