1163. Impact of Difficult-to-Treat Resistance on Survival in Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using Electronic Health Record-based Clinical Data From 140 US Hospitals

1163. 难治性耐药对革兰氏阴性菌血症患者生存率的影响:基于美国140家医院电子健康记录临床数据的风险调整分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB), administrative data suggest that “difficult-to-treat resistance” (DTR; i.e., co-resistance to all first-line antibiotics) increases mortality. However, adequate risk-adjustment for severity of illness (SOI) may require granular laboratory and physiologic data. METHODS: Adult inpatients with GNB were identified from electronic health records (EHRs) of 140 hospitals in the Cerner Healthfacts database between 2009 and 2015. Mortality from DTR (intermediate/resistant in vitro to β-lactams including carbapenems and fluoroquinolones) was compared with GNB phenotypes susceptible to at least one first-line agent, but otherwise resistant to carbapenems (CR), extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ECR), or fluoroquinolones (FQR) per US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance definitions. Relative risk of mortality was adjusted (aRR) for age, sex, baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Elixhauser comorbidity index, GNB source, taxon, hospital vs. community onset, year, and hospital region, bed capacity, and urban and teaching status using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of 25,448 unique GNB encounters, 207 (1%) met DTR criteria. DTR patients were 2-fold more likely to receive intravenous colistin and 5-fold more likely to receive tigecycline compared with CR cases susceptible to ≥1 first-line agent. Crude mortality varied considerably by taxon and resistance phenotype, but resistance per se was associated with only a minority of overall deaths (DTR = 3% of deaths; any of the four resistance phenotypes = 28% of deaths; Figure 1). Inclusion of EHR-derived, baseline SOFA scores in SOI adjustments decreased aRR effect estimates; nonetheless, all resistance phenotypes still significantly increased mortality (Figure 2A). Among resistance phenotypes, aRR of mortality was similar for DTR vs. CR (aRR = 1.18; 95% CI, 0.91–1.54; P = 0.2), but higher for DTR vs. ECR (aRR = 1.26 [1.01–1.58]; P = 0.04), and DTR vs. FQR (aRR = 1.36 [1.08–1.70]; P = 0.008), respectively (Figure 2B). CONCLUSION: DTR is associated with nonsurvival and greater use of reserve antibiotics in GNB, but adds little to the risk of death associated with CR. The impact of resistance on survival is attenuated but still present even after risk adjustment using granular clinical data. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。