Abstract
Neural conditioning to scenarios of muscle disuse is undoubtedly a cause of functional decrements that typically exceed losses of muscle size. Yet establishing the relative contribution of neural adaptation and the specific location in the motor pathway remains technically challenging. Several studies of healthy humans have targeted this system and have established that motor unit firing rate is suppressed following disuse, with a number of critical caveats. It is suppressed in the immobilized limb only, at relative and absolute force levels, and preferentially targets lower-threshold motor units. Concomitantly, electrophysiological investigation of neuromuscular junction transmission (NMJ) stability of lower-threshold motor units reveals minimal change following disuse. These findings contrast with numerous other methods, which show clear involvement of the NMJ but are unable to characterize the motor unit to which they belong. It is physiologically plausible that decrements observed following disuse are a result of suppressed firing rate of lower-threshold motor units and impairment of transmission of the NMJ of higher-threshold motor units. As such, motor units within the pool should be viewed in light of their varying susceptibility to disuse.