Clinical research in the NHS: a cross-sectional study of research engagement during the monkeypox pandemic

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的临床研究:猴痘大流行期间研究参与情况的横断面研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of clinical academics in the UK is under threat. Acute clinical crises can increase opportunities for clinical research. We aimed to examine research involvement among clinicians working in sexual health and HIV medicine during the monkeypox (mpox) pandemic and identify factors associated with differential research engagement. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study between August and October 2022 using anonymised, self-reported data collected via an online survey disseminated worldwide across multiple specialties. We assessed demographic characteristics, research involvement and outputs, workplace setting, involvement with policy work and public health agencies and media. We examined differences by geographical location comparing the UK, European Union (EU) and the USA. RESULTS: Of 139 total respondents from the UK, none identified themselves as clinical researchers, compared with 23/210 (11.0%) from the EU and 5/58 (8.6%) from the USA. Overall research engagement was lowest in the UK (15.1% vs EU 36.7% and USA 37.9%). In the UK, research activity was greater among consultant physicians (19.5% vs 18.8% doctors-in-training and 4.9% nurses), those aged 35–50 years (19.7% vs 15.4% <35 and 8.5% >50 years), males (34.3% vs 7.1% females and 33.3% non-binary) and those who self-identified as White (15.6% vs 13.3% all other). In research-active individuals, measurable research achievements by journal publications or submissions and obtainment of grant funding were significantly higher in older, male, White, consultant physicians. Less disparity across demographic characteristic groups were seen in both the EU and the USA compared with the UK reflecting more diversity among research-active clinicians in overall research activity. Markers of research achievement were closer to parity in representation across gender and race and ethnicity, particularly for the EU. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to and evaluation of existing UK-based recommendations to improve the clinical academic pipeline are needed to increase research engagement and diversity to safeguard future UK clinical research.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。