Abstract
Despite the wide use of plasmids in research and clinical production, the need to verify plasmid sequences is a bottleneck that is too often underestimated in the manufacturing process. Although sequencing platforms continue to improve, the method and assembly pipeline chosen still influence the final plasmid assembly sequence. Furthermore, few dedicated tools exist for plasmid assembly, especially for de novo assembly. Here, we evaluated short-read, long-read, and hybrid (both short and long reads) de novo assembly pipelines across three replicates of a 24-plasmid library. Consistent with previous characterizations of each sequencing technology, short-read assemblies had issues resolving GC-rich regions, and long-read assemblies commonly had small insertions and deletions, especially in repetitive regions. The hybrid approach facilitated the most accurate, consistent assembly generation and identified mutations relative to the reference sequence. Although Sanger sequencing can be used to verify specific regions, some GC-rich and repetitive regions were difficult to resolve using any method, suggesting that easily sequenced genetic parts should be prioritized in the design of new genetic constructs.