Unadjusted Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rates are Not a Useful Quality Measure for Planned or Urgent Orthopaedic Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

未经调整的非计划30天再入院率并非衡量计划内或紧急骨科住院治疗质量的有效指标:一项回顾性队列研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the number of patients who experienced an unplanned hospital readmission following an episode of inpatient care in a tertiary level trauma and orthopaedic service, the reasons for readmission and whether these reasons related to lapses in care, care and service delivery problems, and missed healthcare intervention opportunities and whether they were or should have been prevented and anticipated. We hypothesized that most 30-day readmissions would be unrelated to the original complaint and admission, and the reasons for readmission would not be truly avoidable or attributable to the index hospital admission. We further hypothesized that socioeconomic factors would be predictive of the likelihood of unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge. METHODS: Over a 5-year study period, we identified all adult patients discharged from our unit and those who had an unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. We evaluated the reasons for readmission and assessed the impact of socioeconomic deprivation and social determinants of health on the likelihood of unplanned 30-day readmission using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifteen thousand three hundred thirteen patients were discharged from our unit over the study period. 690 patients (4.5%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge as an unplanned episode of care. 58.4% of unplanned readmissions were directly related to the index admission, but only 9% of readmissions were preventable. The single most frequent reason for readmission was an unrelated noninfective medical complaint, 244 patients (35.4%). Social determinants of health influenced the risk of an unplanned readmission, particularly the Index of Multiple Deprivation and the subdomains related to housing, the living environment, social services, and support. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day readmission rate as a marker of quality for inpatient care should be questioned. It is not useful as an unadjusted metric and can be misleading. Adjusting for socioeconomic influences, preventability of readmissions, and missed opportunities to improve whole health may improve its usefulness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。