Prospective evaluation study of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy without tract dilation: Comparison to with tract dilation

前瞻性评估研究:超声内镜引导下肝胃吻合术(不扩张通道)与扩张通道的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), bile leak usually occurs in the interval between tract dilation and stent deployment. Recently, a novel partially covered self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with fine gauge stent delivery system (5.9Fr) has become available. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of EUS-HGS using this novel stent without tract dilation and compare it with EUS-HGS with tract dilation. METHOD: Patients with biliary disease who required EUS-BD were eligible for enrollment in this study. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of stent deployment without tract dilation. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the one-step technique was 92.0% (23/25). Mean procedure time was 10.1 min, and the clinical success rate was 96% (24/25). As adverse events, bile peritonitis and stent migration were observed in one patient each. As historical controls, 75 patients who underwent EUS-HGS were enrolled in this study. As adverse events, bile peritonitis was observed in eight patients and cholangitis in three patients. After propensity score matching analysis, procedure time was significantly shorter in the one-step group compared with the two-step group (9.84 vs. 19.0 min, P < 0.001). In addition, bile peritonitis as an adverse event was significantly more frequent in the two-step group than the one-step group (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EUS-HGS using this novel PCSEMS might be feasible and safe, and performance of tract dilation might influence the occurrence of bile peritonitis.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。