Abstract
There have been recent reports of transmission-ratio distortion (TRD) or segregation distortion in families not selected for genetic disease. If TRD exists but is ignored, linkage studies searching for disease genes in affected relatives may be misinterpreted. We show that the identical-by-descent sharing patterns for affected sib pairs are strongly affected by TRD and, further, that the estimated statistical significance of a sib-pair linkage study may be extremely biased. However, we also show that, if TRD is suspected during the planning stage of a study, the planned sample size of the study needs to be increased by only a small amount to maintain the desired power.