Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nerve transfer procedures are performed in patients with proximal nerve injuries to optimize their potential for functional recovery. The study aimed to determine the preferred surgical technique and tool used by peripheral nerve surgeons to transect nerves in nerve transfers. METHODS: All current members of the American Society of Peripheral Nerve were invited to complete a cross-sectional 10-question survey. Data on practice demographics, nerve-cutting instruments/techniques used, and their belief on whether this impacted patient outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 49 American Society of Peripheral Nerve members participated in the study, the majority of whom were over 10 years into practice (n = 30/49; 61%). The most common response was a scalpel blade (n = 26/49; 53%), with the remaining 47% using iris scissors, micro-serrated scissors, a razor blade, specialized nerve microscissors, or a specialized nerve-cutting device. The number of years in practice (P = 0.0271) and the percentage of practice that involves treating patients with peripheral nerve injuries (P = 0.0054) is significantly associated with the belief that crushing the donor nerves during transection may result in worse outcomes following nerve transfer. Only the latter is significantly associated with this belief in recipient nerves (P = 0.0214). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that peripheral nerve surgeons believe that the technique used to transect nerves before coaptation influences outcomes after nerve transfer. Further ex vivo studies are necessary to investigate how different cutting techniques influence nerve morphology and scarring at the coaptation site to optimize outcomes after peripheral nerve surgery.