Macrophage Polarization Status Impacts Nanoceria Cellular Distribution but Not Its Biotransformation or Ferritin Effects

巨噬细胞极化状态影响纳米铈的细胞分布,但不影响其生物转化或铁蛋白效应

阅读:9
作者:Uschi M Graham, Alan K Dozier, David J Feola, Michael T Tseng, Robert A Yokel

Abstract

The innate immune system is the first line of defense against external threats through the initiation and regulation of inflammation. Macrophage differentiation into functional phenotypes influences the fate of nanomaterials taken up by these immune cells. High-resolution electron microscopy was used to investigate the uptake, distribution, and biotransformation of nanoceria in human and murine M1 and M2 macrophages in unprecedented detail. We found that M1 and M2 macrophages internalize nanoceria differently. M1-type macrophages predominantly sequester nanoceria near the plasma membrane, whereas nanoceria are more uniformly distributed throughout M2 macrophage cytoplasm. In contrast, both macrophage phenotypes show identical nanoceria biotransformation to cerium phosphate nanoneedles and simultaneous nanoceria with ferritin co-precipitation within the cells. Ferritin biomineralization is a direct response to nanoparticle uptake inside both macrophage phenotypes. We also found that the same ferritin biomineralization mechanism occurs after the uptake of Ce-ions into polarized macrophages and into unpolarized human monocytes and murine RAW 264.7 cells. These findings emphasize the need for evaluating ferritin biomineralization in studies that involve the internalization of nano objects, ranging from particles to viruses to biomolecules, to gain greater mechanistic insights into the overall immune responses to nano objects.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。