Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dentists and dental professionals report a high prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and related symptoms. Chronic exposure to high-frequency dental instrument sounds, which can damage the outer hair cells (OHCs) of the cochlea, is strongly linked to their NIHL. Similarly, dental students in teaching clinics often report symptoms associated with NIHL. In this study, we measured plasma levels of prestin and otolin-1, two biomarkers associated with inner ear health, in first-year (D1) and third-year (D3) dental students. D1 students were selected for their relatively short exposure to dental clinics, while D3 students represented a group with substantial cumulative exposure. First-year (M1) medical students, who have no exposure to dental instruments, served as the negative controls, while dental faculty, many of whom are diagnosed with NIHL or self-report hearing problems, served as the positive controls. METHODS: Thirty-one students (D1=11, D3=8, M1=12) and 10 dental faculty volunteered for the study. Participating students completed an online survey about their hearing health, exposure to excessive sounds within and outside school, and use of hearing protection. Sound levels of medical Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and dental Simulation (SIM) labs while in session were recorded with a calibrated sound meter. Plasma levels of prestin and otolin-1 were quantitated using commercial ELISA kits. RESULTS: The sound level of in-session OMM lab was significantly higher (72.64 ± 1.69 dBA) than SIM lab (65.37 ± 3.97 dBA). Both medical and dental students experienced similar exposure to outside school noises; however, dental students had significantly longer exposure to high-frequency dental instrument sounds in the SIM lab (12.3 hours/week; 74.93-80.51 dBA). Plasma prestin levels were lowest in D3 students (559.88 ± 24.91 ng/ml), followed by D1 students (576.27 ± 71.44 ng/ml). Negative control M1 students had higher levels (675.73 ± 90.23 ng/ml), while the positive control dental faculty group exhibited the highest prestin levels (727.71 ± 128.65 ng/ml). Prestin levels in D3 students were significantly lower than those in M1 students, and the dental faculty group had significantly higher prestin levels than both D1 and D3 students. No differences in otolin-1 levels were observed among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that D3 students, with greater experience using dental instruments in the SIM lab, exhibited the lowest plasma prestin levels may indicate a protective mechanism by the OHCs, downregulating its expression to reduce the risk of NIHL. This is in line with the findings in the dental faculty, who self-reported NIHL or hearing problems and exhibited the highest prestin levels. The lack of changes in plasma otolin-1 levels across groups, combined with students self-reporting excellent hearing health, may offer alternate view of subclinical inner ear damage among dental students. Future studies incorporating audiometry and otoacoustic emission tests along with the inner ear biomarkers may provide better understanding of NIHL in dental students.