Abstract
It has been reported that the high-growth reassortant (HGR) A(H3N2) influenza viruses used for split influenza vaccine (SV) production have some amino acid substitutions in hemagglutinin due to egg adaptation during virus propagation, causing antigenic differences between HGR and epidemic viruses. To clarify whether inactivated whole-virus vaccine (WV) derived from the A(H3N2) HGR virus possessing egg adaptation could induce cross-protective immune responses against epidemic A(H3N2) viruses, the efficacy of WV was compared with that of SV in a ferret model. When the ferrets immunized with WV or SV derived from HGR A/Victoria/361/2011 (IVR-165) virus were challenged with the homologous virus A/Victoria/361/2011 (IVR-165) or its original cell-propagated A/Victoria/361/2011 virus, respectively, WV successfully shortened the duration of virus shedding of both challenge viruses, whereas SV shortened only that of the homologous virus, A/Victoria/361/2011 (IVR-165). When WV-immunized ferrets were challenged with A/Fukushima/69/2015 virus, which is an epidemic virus antigenically different from the A/Victoria/361/2011 virus, WV could shorten the duration of shedding of this virus. In addition, we found that early induction of nasal IgG and IgA antibodies by vaccines helped shorten the virus-shedding period, although this was dependent on the degree of difference in antigenicity of the challenge virus. These results indicate that vaccination with WV, not with SV, would be a solution to avoid decreased vaccine effectiveness due to the antigenic change of HGR virus by egg adaptation during virus propagation.