Diagnostic impact of CEA and CA 15-3 on chemotherapy monitoring of breast cancer patients

CEA和CA 15-3对乳腺癌患者化疗监测的诊断意义

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Serum tumor markers have emerged as an effective tool to determine prognosis and treatment efficiency in different cancer types. This study aimed to explore the chemotherapy monitoring efficiency and prognostic sensitivity of tumor-associated cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in early (II) and late (IV) clinical stage breast cancer. METHODS: CA 15-3 and CEA serum levels were assessed in 56 breast cancer patients at early (n = 26) and late (n = 30) clinical stages with these primary inclusion criteria: those who received adjuvant chemotherapy AC (adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) or AC-T (adriamycin and cyclophosphamide followed by taxane) regimens and possessed tumors negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) based on a particle-enhanced turbidimetric assay. RESULTS: CA 15-3 had a higher elevation than CEA in the pretreatment group of breast cancer patients when compared to healthy controls. Late-stage patients showed higher positive serum levels than early-stage patients for both markers, with a preference for CA 15-3 over CEA. AC-T chemotherapy regimen treatment in both clinical stages revealed a significantly higher level of both markers as compared to the AC regime, with a preference for CA 15-3 over CEA in late stage. Both markers were significantly higher in the late-stage group as compared to early-stage groups for both chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: CA 15-3 is more efficient as a prognostic monitoring marker than CEA and reveals a positive connection between chemotherapy regimen system and staging, with increased observability in late-stage patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。