Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis

股骨颈骨折内固定失败后行全髋关节置换术与初次全髋关节置换术并发症的比较:一项荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this meta-analysis, we discuss the complication rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) following failed internal fixation (IF) of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) versus primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for eligible publications published prior to December 2024. The search terms included "femoral neck fracture", "internal fixation failure", and "total hip arthroplasty". The mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) were used as combined variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were chosen. RESULTS: Six non-randomized-controlled clinical trials comprising 1,301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled data revealed statistically significant differences in postoperative deep infection rates (RD=0.04; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.08; p=0.009), periprosthetic fractures (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.05; p=0.03), and reoperation rates (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.11; p=0.0002) between the cTHA and pTHA groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative dislocations (RD=0.05; 95% CI: -0.03-0.13; p=0.19), deep vein thrombosis (RD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04-0.03; p=0.77), superficial infections (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.02-0.06; p=0.37), or revision surgeries (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.01-0.05; p=0.13). CONCLUSION: Compared to pTHA, cTHA following failed IF of FNFs was associated with higher deep infection, periprosthetic fractures, and reoperation rates.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。