Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, patient awareness and demands for dental aesthetic have increased tremendously. AIM: To compare between MZ and DL for SR and CR. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 64 samples were included and divided into two groups, i.e. A and B. RESULT: Significant difference in LD for SR and CS for MZ and LD while nonsignificant for MZ for SR. CONCLUSION: Minimum change in CS and SR was shown by 0.1% CD in both MZ and LD groups.