A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Enteral Antibiotics Combined With Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation Alone in Elective Colorectal Resections

系统评价和荟萃分析比较了择期结直肠切除术中肠内抗生素联合机械性肠道准备与单独机械性肠道准备的疗效

阅读:1

Abstract

This study compares the outcomes of elective colorectal surgery in patients who received enteral antibiotics (EAb) in addition to standard care (SC) (mechanical bowel preparation and intravenous antibiotics) to those who received SC alone. This study will review existing research on the impact of prophylactic EAb on colorectal surgery outcomes. Relevant studies were identified from electronic medical databases and analysed using the statistical software RevMan (Review Manager 5.4, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) based on the principles of meta-analysis. A total of 13 studies (nine RCTs and four comparative trials) on 9,466 patients for postoperative outcomes were included. A random-effects model analysis was conducted, revealing that anastomotic leak rates were higher in the control group, with no heterogeneity observed. Surgical site infections were higher in the control group with moderate heterogeneity. Postoperative mortality and readmission rates were similar in both groups. The use of EAb is associated with a reduced incidence of anastomotic leaks and surgical site infections; however, readmission rates and mortality require further assessment in a major, multicenter, randomised study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。