Superficial and deep cervical plexus blocks versus patient-controlled analgesia in total laryngectomy; a randomized trial

全喉切除术中颈丛浅层和深层阻滞与患者自控镇痛的比较:一项随机试验

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The cervical plexus block (CPB) delivers analgesia for surgeries in the head and neck . Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been utilized to enhance pain management. This study evaluates combined bilateral superficial and deep CPB versus PCA in postoperative pain management after total laryngectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randimized two equal groups: the CPB group (n = 25), who received combined bilateral US-guided superficial and deep CBP, and the PCA group (n = 25), who received PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) . The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes, fentanyl consumption, first rescue analgesia, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Postoperative VAS scores (at 2 and 4 h) were greater in the PCA group compared to the CPB group, p values (0.031, 0.044), respectively. The results were comparable at 6 and 12 h; while at 18 and 24 h, they were elevated in the CPB. The intraoperative hemodynamics were elevated in the PCA group at skin incision and after 30 min. Fentanyl consumption, first rescue analgesia, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were comparable. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided combined bilateral superficial and deep CPB provided superior analgesia in the early postoperative period compared to PCA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za PACTR202403682323400.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。