Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) vs. Titanium Plates for Upper Limb Fractures: A Systematic Review

碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(PEEK)板与钛板治疗上肢骨折的比较:系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates have emerged as alternatives to titanium locking plates for fixation of upper-limb fractures. Advantages may include an elastic modulus closer to bone, fewer imaging artefacts, and reduced stress shielding. This systematic review synthesizes comparative clinical evidence. We analyzed data from five comparative studies (n = 210 patients; CFR-PEEK = 108, titanium = 102) provided in the dataset. Searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library identified relevant trials. Data were extracted for demographics, interventions, functional outcomes, complications, and imaging findings, following PRISMA-style methodology. Five studies (three proximal humerus, two distal radius) were included. Overall complication rates were lower with CFR-PEEK compared to titanium. Functional outcomes were generally comparable, though one study showed improved Constant and OSS scores for CFR-PEEK. Imaging clarity was consistently superior with CFR-PEEK. CFR-PEEK plates demonstrate similar or superior clinical outcomes compared with titanium plates in upper limb fractures, with fewer complications and superior radiographic visibility. Evidence remains limited, requiring larger RCTs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。