Comparison of apparent and three-dimensional pupillary diameter measurements in cataract patients and their impact on multifocal intraocular lens selection

比较白内障患者表观瞳孔直径和三维瞳孔直径测量值及其对多焦点人工晶状体选择的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

The pupillary diameter (PD) clinically observed and measured by conventional devices represents a apparent PD of the anatomical pupil projected onto the corneal plane, yet the relationship between this apparent PD and three-dimensional PD (3D PD) in cataract patients remains unclear. This prospective cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between apparent PD and 3D PD in cataract patients and its clinical impact on multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) selection. This study included 114 eyes from 72 cataract patients. Apparent PD and 3D PD were measured using Pentacam AXL. Statistical analyses included comparative, correlation, nonlinear relationship, and agreement methods. The clinical impact was assessed through predicted MIOL selections. Apparent PD significantly exceeded 3D PD (3.68 ± 0.76 vs. 2.50 ± 0.44 mm, P < 0.001), with a mean magnification ratio of 47.2 ± 16.5%. The magnification effect increased with pupil size: in eyes with apparent PD < 3.0 mm, 3.0-4.5 mm, and > 4.5 mm, the magnification ratios were 36.18%, 46.93%, and 63.57%, respectively. Strong positive correlation was found between 3D PD and apparent PD (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). For MIOL selection (PD > 2.8 mm threshold), apparent PD identified 90 eyes as suitable while 3D PD identified only 19 eyes, resulting in altered MIOL selection in 71 eyes (62.28%). Apparent PD overestimates 3D PD by 47.2% in cataract patients, increasing the likelihood of MIOL selection due to PD overestimation. Clinicians should consider this magnification effect during preoperative MIOL evaluation to avoid overestimation of functional PD.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。