Abstract
This study presents the dynamic characterization of a gas turbine blade manufactured from two different nickel-based superalloys: on the first hand, a superalloy called René 80 and, on the second hand, a directionally solidified (DS) nickel-based anisotropic superalloy, investigated during the validation phase of the development process. Starting from the original CAD geometry, precise and very detailed finite-element models were developed, progressively refined and modified, and consequently validated to ensure mesh-independent modal predictions. The study examines multiple possible sources of discrepancy between experimentally measured and numerically predicted natural frequencies, including geometric deviations, grouping of different interesting points, broach-block test configuration, material anisotropy, and the influence of internal rib turbulators. Statistical analyses of dimensional variations revealed no significant correlation with the observed frequency scatter, redirecting the investigation toward material behavior and modeling fidelity. The inclusion of turbulators in the finite-element model proved essential, reducing prediction errors for the first two modes by approximately 2-3%. For the DS superalloy, the effect of grain orientation was evaluated over permissible angular deviations (extremes were considered); however, no systematic and clear improvement in frequency prediction was observed. Finally, several tuning strategies were assessed, leading to an optimization procedure that simultaneously adjusted the elastic moduli Ex and Ez, reducing modal frequency deviations to below 1% for the first two modes. The proposed methodology provides a robust and solid framework for the validation of turbine blade dynamic behavior across different materials and manufacturing conditions.