Re-evaluation of Incorrect Posture as a Diagnostic Criterion for Scoliosis in School Screenings: A Cross-Sectional Study in Vietnam

重新评估姿势不正确作为学校筛查中脊柱侧弯诊断标准的价值:一项越南横断面研究

阅读:1

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis through school screening and to evaluate the correlation between incorrect posture identified during screening and the confirmed diagnosis of scoliosis, utilizing the gold standard criterion in 3,527 children aged 10 to 17 years from March 2023 to December 2023 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The evaluation method included Adam's forward bending test with the angle of trunk rotation, and a cut-off point greater than or equal to 5°. Based on clinical examination, the research results show that 312 (8.7%) children were suspected of having scoliosis. Still, the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis confirmed by X-rays was 130 (3.6%) children, with the standard being Cobb angle ≥10°. Most people with idiopathic scoliosis had moderate curves, including 119 (91.5%) and 130 (100%) demonstrated positive vertebral body rotation, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.11:1. The study identified a correlation between suspected scoliosis and incorrect posture seen during screening, including "shoulder-height difference", "any curve in the spine", and "humps on one side" (p < 0.001). However, no correlation was determined between these listed incorrect postures and a definitive diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis by X-rays (p > 0.05). The results of the research suggest that incorrect posture found by clinical assessment shouldn't be used as the main criterion for scoliosis diagnosis during screening. The use of the angle of trunk rotation, combined with Adam's forward bending test and a suitable cut-off angle, is required to be considered for scoliosis screening in schools.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。