Abstract
Tool structure design methodologies predominantly rely on trial-and-error approaches or single-objective optimization but fail to achieve coordinated enhancement of multiple performance metrics while lacking thorough investigation into complex cutting coupling mechanisms. This study proposes a multi-objective optimization framework integrating joint simulation approaches. First, a finite element model for orthogonal turning was developed, incorporating the hyperbolic tangent (TANH) constitutive model and variable coefficient friction model. The cutting performance of four micro-groove configurations is comparatively analyzed. Subsequently, parametric modeling coupled with simulation-data interaction enables multi-objective optimization targeting minimized cutting force, reduced cutting temperature, and decreased wear rate. The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) explores Pareto-optimized solutions for arc micro-groove geometric parameters. Finally, optimized tools manufactured via powder metallurgy undergo experimental validation. The results demonstrate that the optimized tool achieves significant improvements: a 19.3% reduction in cutting force, a 14.2% decrease in cutting temperature, and tool life extended by 33.3% compared to baseline tools. Enhanced chip control is evidenced by an 11.4% reduction in chip curl radius, accompanied by diminished oxidation/adhesive wear and superior surface finish. This multi-objective optimization methodology effectively overcomes the constraints of conventional single-parameter optimization, substantially improving comprehensive tool performance while establishing a reference paradigm for cutting tool design under complex operational conditions.