Performance of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Ultraprocessed Food Intake According to the Nova Classification System in the United States NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

美国国立卫生研究院-美国退休人员协会饮食与健康研究:基于Nova分类系统的食物频率问卷在评估超加工食品摄入量方面的表现

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: How accurately ultraprocessed food (UPF) intake is measured by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of a 124-item FFQ for estimating UPF intake with Nova. METHODS: In 1311 NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study participants who completed 2 nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls (24HDR) and 2 FFQ, we used 2 methods to estimate UPF intake. First, 4 experts independently matched FFQ items to food descriptions from another FFQ classified previously according to Nova. Discordant descriptions were discussed, and a consensus reached. Second, data from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intake of Individuals were used to match disaggregated FFQ items to Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) and standard reference (SR) codes. Nova classification of FNDDS and SR codes was based on database linkage. We evaluated FFQ performance using a measurement error model with 2 24HDR as the reference to estimate validity coefficients (ρ(Q,T)) and attenuation factors (λ(Q)). We applied parametric bootstrapping to construct 95% confidence intervals, accounting for the repeated measures structure in the data. RESULTS: For energy-adjusted, kilocalories from UPF (kcal/d), ρ(Q,T) were 0.50 (0.39-0.61) and 0.44 (0.30-0.59), for males and females, respectively, for the expert consensus method (ECM) and 0.52 (0.40-0.63) and 0.43 (0.29-0.57) for the food code method (FCM). For energy-adjusted, gram weight from UPF (g/d), ρ(Q,T) were 0.65 (0.60-0.71) and 0.66 (0.60-0.72) for the ECM and 0.66 (0.52-0.65) and 0.66 (0.59-0.72) for the FCM; λ(Q) were ≥0.50 for both methods. UPF variables, defined using the ECM and FCM but expressed in the same unit, were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: FCM, performed similarly to ECM but has the potential to standardize UPF exposures across studies because the Nova categorization is assigned at a more granular level through database linkage. UPF intake based on energy-adjusted gram weight outperformed intake based on energy alone.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。