Abstract
Diagnosing fractures in hummingbirds is challenging because of their small size. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement of four imaging modalities-conventional radiography, dental radiography, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and three-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed images from micro-CT scans-for identifying fractures in 16 ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) admitted to a wildlife hospital. Six independent reviewers, with or in training for a specialty in veterinary radiology or wildlife medicine, assessed randomized image sets. Gross dissection of the carcasses using dermestid beetle larvae established the gold standard. Diagnostic performance metrics-sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios-were calculated for each modality. Inter-reviewer agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. Our results demonstrated that advanced imaging techniques improved diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement compared to traditional radiography. While specificity (>88%) was comparable to other small animal studies, the sensitivity did not exceed 50% across all modalities. This low sensitivity reflects the challenges posed by minimal fracture displacement and hummingbirds' extremely small size. Only 3D images achieved high positive likelihood ratios and superior inter-reviewer agreement, highlighting the unique value of 3D visualization in complex anatomical evaluations. Overall, the minute structures of hummingbirds present inherent diagnostic limitations, underscoring that negative radiographic results must be interpreted cautiously, and the possibility of false negatives should prompt consideration of advanced or follow-up imaging when clinical suspicion persists.