Novel approach for noninvasive pelvic floor muscle strength measurement using extracorporeal surface perineal pressure measurement and machine learning modeling

一种利用体外表面会阴压力测量和机器学习模型进行无创盆底肌力测量的新方法

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength is crucial for the management of pelvic floor disorders. However, the current methods are invasive, uncomfortable, and lack standardization. This study aimed to introduce a novel noninvasive approach for precise PFM strength quantification by leveraging extracorporeal surface perineal pressure (ESPP) measurements and machine learning algorithms. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy women participated in this study. ESPP measurements were obtained using a 10 × 10 pressure array sensor during maximal voluntary PFM contractions in a seated position. Simultaneously, transabdominal ultrasound was used to measure bladder base displacement (mm) as a reference for PFM contraction strength. Seven ESPP variables were calculated based on ESPP data and intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were assessed. Machine learning algorithms predicted bladder base displacement from ESPP variables. RESULTS: The ESPP measurements demonstrated good to excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.881) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.967) reliability. Significant correlations were observed between bladder base displacement and middle (r = .619, P < .001) and front (r = -.379, P =.002) vectors. The top-performing models for predicting bladder base displacement were the support vector machine [root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.139, R2 = 0.542], random forest (RMSE = 0.123, R2 = 0.367), and AdaBoost (RMSE = 0.123, R2 = 0.320) on the training set, and AdaBoost (RMSE = 0.173, R2 = 0.537), random forest (RMSE = 0.177, R2 = 0.512), and support vector machine (RMSE = 0.178, R2 = 0.508) on the test set. In predicting bladder base displacement, Bland-Altman analysis revealed these models had minimal systematic bias, with mean differences ranging from -0.007 to 0.066, and clinically acceptable limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential of ESPP measurements and machine learning algorithms as a reliable and valid noninvasive approach for assessing PFM strength by quantifying the directionality of contractions, overcoming the limitations of traditional techniques.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。