Effect of different types of internal fixation on the incidence of femoral head necrosis in adult femoral neck fractures: a single-arm rate and network meta-analysis

不同类型内固定对成人股骨颈骨折股骨头坏死发生率的影响:单组率和网络荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) remains a devastating complication following internal fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Despite advancements in fixation techniques, the comparative efficacy among methods for mitigating this risk remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of various internal fixation methods on the incidence of femoral head necrosis in adult femoral neck fractures based on single-arm rate and network meta-analysis (NMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched (inception-September 2024). Eligible studies reported ONFH rates in adults treated with cannulated screws (CCS), dynamic hip screws (DHS), or femoral neck system (FNS). Single-arm rates were pooled via random-effects models; Bayesian NMA ranked interventions. RESULTS: 52 studies (5649 patients) were included. Pooled ONFH rates were CCS 15% (95% CI: 0.13-0.18; I(2) = 83.5%); FNS 12% (95% CI: 0.02-0.28; I(2) = 51.2%), DHS 29% (95% CI: 0.20-0.39 1 study). NMA ranked FNS + CCS (SUCRA = 0.63) and FNS alone (SUCRA = 0.52) as optimal followed by DHS (SUCRA = 0.34), DHS + CCS (SUCRA = 0.33), and CCS (SUCRA = 0.52). Anatomical reduction (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.56) and Garden I-II fractures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.21-0.41) significantly reduced ONFH risk. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, FNS is associated with the lowest incidence of ONFH. These findings, derived predominantly from observational data, are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation by high-quality randomized controlled trials.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。