Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in Giant Cell Arteritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis

生物制剂治疗巨细胞动脉炎的疗效和安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA), impacting individuals over 50, causes vision loss, headaches, and jaw pain due to inflammation from proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Standard treatment involves glucocorticoids, with tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors currently being studied. METHOD: This meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, included adult GCA patients treated with biological agents. The search covered PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus until October 2023, excluding nonhuman, pediatric, non-English, and nonrandomized studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, with random effects models calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT: A meta-analysis of 11 studies ( n  = 924) demonstrated higher remission rates with biological agents (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.17-5.71; p  = 0.02; I (2 ) = 70%), especially tocilizumab (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.22-15.21; p  = 0.02). Nonsignificant trends favored biological agents for relapse rates (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05; p  = 0.07) and control for adverse effects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.02; p  = 0.07). However, TNF inhibitors were linked to increased infection rates (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.17-4.96; p  = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab effectively induces remission in GCA patients, while abatacept and TNF inhibitors offer minimal benefits with increased infection risks, according to this meta-analysis. Treatment decisions should consider these factors, and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biological agents in managing GCA.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。