A comparative study of glide path instruments assessing flexibility and torsion by finite element method

采用有限元法对滑行路径仪器的柔性和扭转性能进行比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study presents a novel numerical evaluation of the bending and torsion behavior of four nickel-titanium glide path instruments, addressing a critical gap in understanding their mechanical performance under clinical conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The evaluated instruments include the WaveOne Gold Glider with a parallelogram cross-section, the R-Pilot with an S-shaped cross-section, the ProGlider with a square cross-section, and the V Taper 2H with a triangular cross-section. Using advanced computer-aided design (CAD) software, detailed geometric models of each instrument were created, followed by numerical simulations performed in the SolidWorks finite element platform. Material properties of nickel-titanium alloys and boundary conditions were defined based on ISO 3630-1 specifications for bending and torsion tests. RESULTS: The findings revealed significant variations in stress distribution and flexibility among the instruments. Notably, the R-Pilot demonstrated superior flexibility, being approximately 57% more flexible than the WaveOne Gold with a 28 mm deflection during bending. Conversely, the V Taper 2H exhibited the highest stress levels in bending tests. While torsional stress was comparable among V Taper 2H, ProGlider, and WaveOne Gold at approximately 500 MPa, R-Pilot showed the highest stress values under torsional loads. Additionally, distinct differences in stress distribution were observed between reciprocating and rotational glide paths. CONCLUSIONS: These insights underscore the necessity of evaluating both bending and torsion behaviors to optimize the design and clinical performance of glide path instruments.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。