Comparative Outcomes Following Candida Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

左心室辅助装置患者发生念珠菌血流感染后的比较结果

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) carry a high risk of adverse outcomes. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used to manage end-stage heart failure; however, they carry a risk of infection. This study evaluates the impact of LVAD presence on outcomes in patients with Candida BSI. METHODS: A total of 1233 patients with Candida BSI admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively included, with 39 having an LVAD at the time of infection. Demographics, microbiologic data, and clinical factors associated with Candida BSI were recorded. Risk factors for Candida BSI and 30 and 90-day mortality were compared. RESULTS: Patients with Candida BSI in the LVAD cohort were more likely male (77% vs 54%, P = .01) versus the non-LVAD group, and more frequently had central venous access before infection (67% vs 46% P = .01). Rates of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were higher in the LVAD group (39% vs 0.4%, P < .0001). Candida parapsilosis was the most common species in patients with LVAD (38% in LVAD vs 16%), compared to Candida albicans in the non-LVAD cohort (24% in LVAD vs 39%). HeartMate2 was the most common LVAD (21 patients, 54%). There was no difference in all-cause 30-day (30.7% vs 34.5%, P = .62) and 90-day mortality between the LVAD and non-LVAD cohorts (38.4% vs 40.7%, P = .77). In an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, LVAD presence also did not impact 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.77; P = .62]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Candida BSI, presence of an LVAD did not impact 30- or 90-day mortality.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。