Comparisons of efficacy and safety of immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease treatment: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

阿尔茨海默病免疫疗法疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a major challenge due to limited effective therapies. Moreover, direct comparisons between newly developed and symptomatic drugs are lacking. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immunotherapies for AD. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 29 June 2024. Eligible studies included adults with AD receiving immunotherapy versus placebo or symptomatic treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-nine RCTs were included. Donanemab and lecanemab ranked among the most effective treatments for improving cognitive function (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes P-scores: 0.88 and 0.77) and daily activities (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living P-scores: 0.85 and 0.90), based on network meta-analysis findings. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, particularly donanemab and lecanemab, demonstrated superior efficacy over other immunotherapies in slowing cognitive deterioration, supporting their role in AD management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023461680.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。